Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
ISD Chanisa Nemes wrote: Deleted some off-topic posts as well as some posts with offensive language. [img]http://i.giphy.com/l4FGkR6E0Jg100H3W.gif[/img] Please remember to be respectful! Fozzie made this ******* feedback thread to get fee...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.15 00:00:27
|
2. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Trevize Demerzel wrote: starmaser darkborn wrote: I don't fly rorqs but I feel like the problems have other solutions. For example: - Make EWAR not operable during PANIC - Make a Cyno not usable during PANIC or you cant PANIC while using a...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.13 17:23:39
|
3. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Sounds like a good idea to me, and a heck of a lot less boring than solo-running sites. Seriously though, no one's saying you *have* to multibox this to make it efficient. The Rorqual still mines the larger rocks bett...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.12 19:27:46
|
4. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
You know it's funny with the "pve group booster" thing getting everyone saying you HAVE to multi box to mine properly but I wonder how the reaction would be if ccp made some rats only kill able by subcap S, some rats with mechanics to ecm/web fig...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.12 06:19:09
|
5. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Nasar Vyron wrote: Iminent Penance wrote: Usually the average distance you will achieve is 1000m give or take and that's ignoring a TON of travel time and other factors that decimate the yield i mentioned (drone sharpshooting can add 1km o...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.07 02:59:56
|
6. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Nasar Vyron wrote: Gadzooki wrote: You might want to check your math, shorter cycles is infact a nerf (more time in transit). Or are you one of those "my minerals are free" morons? That is Cade you're talking to. He would like everyone to...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.06 20:49:08
|
7. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Iminent Penance wrote: multiboxing exhumers being more cost efficient = more accounts to plex. Except this thread is full of people saying how they re-subbed accounts to fly Rorquals and anyone who was using Exhume...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.06 20:20:23
|
8. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jasper Binchiette wrote: I refuse to believe the folks at CCP are stupid or lack intelligence, so what's going on? multiboxing exhumers being more cost efficient = more accounts to plex. Or fozzie is just trying to be an edgelord like his ...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.06 17:29:25
|
9. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
If mining is "too toxic and easy" make guns where you have to aim them in space, not just hit f1. If mining is "too afk" make combat drones need specific utilities like carrier fighters. All of them. Kill "afk gameplay" right? /s To those quot...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.04 07:04:55
|
10. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cpt Buckshot wrote: This is why Eve is struggling with low player base. These changes are just stupid for the most part, there were other ways to fix this. I wonder did they even ask a true rorqual pilot what he thinks about the changes or wha...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.03 16:07:56
|
11. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jacques Arkaral wrote: Cade Windstalker lays out a sound case as to the economics. Anyone can claim "SUPPLY N DEMAND *****" over and over and over, but that doesnt change the fact that demand is being artificially smacked around by a god-ha...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.03 16:01:03
|
12. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Look at cost history on the minerals though. They have risen from years of supreme isk deflation and the components to build excavators are extremely hefty. If you nerf anything needing rare drops, "supply and demand" is irrelevant when some omnip...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.03 15:41:18
|
13. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Iminent Penance wrote: By that logic nerf all ships to make capitals barely 2x subcap dps and super capitals 2.5x tops. Cut dreads dps, carriers, Titans, and supers by 55%. They'd still be "the best" by this deranged logic of "balance" Then us...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.02 18:10:09
|
14. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: JonasML wrote: From the original dev post for Rorquals...."Whether these modes are running or not, the ability to field 5 GÇÿExcavatorGÇÖ Mining Superdrones will make the Rorqual the greatest mining vessel in the history of...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.03.02 11:56:42
|
15. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: milandinia wrote: If Panic is such a problem, an easy solution would simply be that if you use any offensive modules or any aggression, there is a cool down timer before you can use PANIC. Forcing a lock on a rock ...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.02.24 20:24:18
|
16. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Grognard Commissar wrote: someone did the math, you'll loose fully 25% of ur optimal yield... http://pastebin.com/8WbfwhGU i don't think i've ever seen CCP take such massive nerfbats to anything... maybe CCP should try nerfing carriers 25% ...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.02.24 02:23:27
|
17. Sticky:[March] Rorqual and Mining changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
zzzbowlcutmcgee zzz wrote: Cade Windstalker wrote: Mason Odell wrote: So many other ways to approach this change then straight out nerfing stuff into the ground. Make Battleships Viable Again Encourage more huge fights and objecti...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2017.02.24 02:15:44
|
18. ECM drones/ECM ships need to be nerfed. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I dont get it, what's wrong with me targeting something and them not being able to target me back? Seems fair to me, noob
- by Iminent Penance - at 2013.03.08 13:18:00
|
19. AFK Cloaking Camping High Rewards, Zero Risk Zero Effort - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Onomerous wrote: Andy Landen wrote: Onomerous wrote: No two ways about it, cloaking (even AFK cloaking) isn't really something which destroys EVE. No local then no problem. WH'ers live with it and NS can do it as well. This thread...
- by Iminent Penance - at 2013.03.08 13:17:00
|
20. Dueling Made Fair - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This can be solved by placing tech moons in hisec
- by Iminent Penance - at 2013.03.08 13:16:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |